Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights although respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided by the decision of your Supreme Court in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking during the present case. In this kind of circumstances, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is also dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon through the prosecution against the petitioner and his previously mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined with the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there is a delay of in the future while in the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness of your alleged event as well as prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession with the petitioners continues to be tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired to generally be the real brothers in the deceased but they did not react in the slightest degree to the confessional statements on the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not appear much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is no explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making from the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on a great number of instances that extra judicial confession of the accused is really a weak form of evidence which may be manoeuvred through the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The get more info prosecution is usually relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word regarding existence of some light at the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners with each other on a motorcycle at 4.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed in the bank and considering the fact that only the appellants were posted with the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
three. I have read the uncovered counsel with the parties and have absent through the record of this case with their able assistance.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
be founded without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is really a horrifying reality, an especially reduced threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 of your Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm into a person causes death of such person, possibly by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is claimed to commit qatl-i-khata.”
after release from the prison he lost interest to contest the instant appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )
two. I have listened to the learned counsel for your parties and also figured out DPG at duration, perused the record and observed that:-
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, would be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It consists of the execution of the convicted person as a consequence of their crime.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and pay out fixation are not entertainable for that reasons that these matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, and also the legal grounds for this petition are insufficient therefore this petition is dismissed, which includes disputed claims and counterclaims on the topic post, therefore this court is not in the position to dilate upon such disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory regulation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are founded by executive companies based on statutes.